So, a while ago I wrote a post discussing an article I'd read about a New Zealand man who was turned away from a restaurant where he and his wife had wanted to have dinner, solely based on the fact that he had a lot of tattoos. This poor guy was told that he 'didn't fit the target market', and the owner deemed him too heavily tattooed to dine there. I'm sure after being turned away for such a superficial and discriminatory reason that the gentleman and his partner wouldn't have wanted to dine there anyway, however that's not really the point.